After a lifetime in development ministry, I believe I’ve discovered the most
crucial principles of good practice for Christian ministries engaged in development,
regardless of scale. These principles are theoretical concepts and practical guidelines that can significantly impact your ministry’s effectiveness.
- Care Before Cure
The first and most fundamental principle is prioritizing caring for the people
we serve over fixing their problems. This principle sets the tone for the rest of our
approach and is key to building trust and relationships.
Suppose you have been raised in a Western culture and education system and
live in a developed country, especially if you have technical know-how (and we all
have the access and ability to search for answers on the internet). In that case,
you will instinctively start by identifying the problems in any given community and
planning an effective solution. You will look for a fix or cure. If the solution doesn’t
fix the problem (achieve results), you will examine the problem cycle, make changes,
and try again. I have seen three or four cycles before the solution is abandoned.
Usually, along the way, you will identify “cultural” barriers or passive resistance
from the community. Eventually, the solution will incorporate fixing the people to
correct the problem. Then congratulations—your solution might technically work.
But now you have a new problem—people don’t like to be fixed. They don’t
like outsiders telling them about their culture, that they are the problem. They
resist the “transformation” we think they need.
Relationships and trust have not been established to overcome this. You have unconsciously put fixing the problem ahead of caring for the people. The English verb to care has its etymological root with to lament. We must be willing to share in the suffering of the people we wish to serve. This sharing takes time, patience, and real listening. They must discover their problems and start small, high-risk, experimental, creative ways to address them. If the project fails, you remain a faithful presence and try, try again. Persistence, relationship, and trust form around the bond of caring you have established.
Eventually, the question arises, “You really care for us? Why?” A door opens to
share the truth of the gospel in the manner described in 1 Peter 3.15ff. - Balance Accountability and Trust
“I trust this man with my life. I would never ask him for receipts.” Less than
a year later (albeit under tremendous pressure from persecution and death
threats), “this man” absconded with all the funds in the church account.
In Christian communities, asking for an accounting of funds or results is often
interpreted as a lack of trust. On the other hand, putting large amounts of cash
in the hands of someone without adequate accountability, boundaries, and
expectations is placing temptation in front of them.
This is even truer in cultures structured with patron-client expectations—the
person you trust is under incredible pressure to use their access to the funds to
benefit his own clients. We, in turn, stand in the position of being a bad or stingy
patron if we don’t look the other way. Getting this balance right is one of the most
complex challenges. The value of accountability for all stakeholders needs to be
taught/learned, never assumed. - Ownership of the Problem
The patron-client (or power/fear) dynamic surfaces in the issue of problem
ownership. We arrive as a well-funded outsider seeking to fix a problem. Our
motivation may be entirely altruistic, but altruism is an alien concept to the people
we serve. They think we must want something in return. The dynamic is that if we
are willing to buy their problem, we are getting something in return. They may
not know what the something is, but they assume it exists. In communities with a
high level of experience in development projects, they know several things:
- We on the frontline are obviously receiving a good salary and maintaining
a healthy lifestyle. - We are putting our expertise to work solving what has now become “our”
problem. - We are helping them grow more food, drill a well, and make a product to
sell—we must be selling this at a profit or kickback. - We will return to fix any future problems with “our” solution to “our”
problem. - We are likely to want something from them in return in the future, i.e., we
are buying their problem, and they are willing to pay the price of a client’s
obligation.
The result is obvious. We are good patrons if we have bought the problem and
the solution belongs to us. A relationship built on this transactional basis means
we will remain good patrons and keep everything we have fixed. This is what we
end up calling dependency. Take, for example, a district in one country where
food was distributed after a famine in 1989 and continued to be distributed due to
chronic food shortages until at least 2012. However, as long as the aid companies
continued to bring the food, a great deal of back-breaking labour to scratch food
out of the soil was avoided (an utterly rational choice to make). Food distribution
had become a job for government workers and a source of income from foreign
governments. Thus, a generation passed, making it so that if the aid ever stopped,
too few actually knew how to grow food to feed themselves.
4. What are Your Expectations for Helping?
Charity is a relatively unknown idea in most cultures. Alms for the poor generates
merit with their god or gods. They think the giver is expecting some measure of repayment, if not in kind, then in loyalty from the recipient. Acceptance of your help puts them in debt and makes them your client. One of the best questions is, “Why are you doing this?” This question is not often asked in the development sector, as our motive is assumed. With persistence, building relationships, and fulfilling our commitments, the question of ‘Why?’ results, opening the door to the subject of the love of the God who sent us and His mercy and grace. But beware: If you hurry the relationship or press for their hearing and acceptance of the gospel—to make a decision for Christ—your motivation will seem offensive. This is a significant pitfall for ministry in a development context.
5. Understanding Worldview: Honour/Shame, Power/Fear, Innocence/Guilt
A Christian and biblical worldview understands how the gospel can be contextualized and effectively communicated to all three worldviews, providing freedom from guilt, fear, or shame. Sin accounts for all three, and Christ’s work on the cross and His resurrection deal with all three.
For an international worker educated only in a reformation theology focused
on the problem of sin, guilt, and punishment (death), it is almost impossible to
understand why our atonement arguments fall on deaf ears. For someone raised
in an honour/shame culture, that version of the gospel utterly fails to address their
existential problem of unbearable shame. The gospel messenger in this worldview
must continually highlight how Christ came to take away our shame and give us a
place of honour before the heavenly Father. Only someone of impeccable honour
can restore their honour—Jesus on the cross for them.
When working with people in a power/fear worldview, the gospel must be
announced as coming to take away our fears, fears of evil spirits, fears of curses,
and fears of the witch doctor. The messenger proclaims the good news that Christ
came to give us the power to live without fear through His Holy Spirit.
6. Freewill and Determinism
The majority of humanity, from all religions and worldviews, sees life through
the lens of fate. Their outcomes are either predetermined by merit or lack of
merit in a previous life (Hinduism and Buddhism) or by the will of their god or
gods based on their karma. This is the most critical barrier to development I have
encountered. The poor believe that being poor is their fate/karma, regardless of
whether their sin or wrongdoing is unknown in a previous life or known in the
present life.
This is also another opportunity to open the door to spiritual change. A good
development project will demonstrate to the beneficiary how the positive change
in their life (handwashing, hygiene, improved health, school attendance) directly results from their own efforts. It will plant the seed of the concept that they can overcome fate by making different choices and efforts. That seed will become the basis for any number of transformational changes, including receptivity to the gospel.
So, in summary, here are six fundamental principles to think through before engaging in a development project:
- Relationship, relationship, relationship – putting CARE before CURE .
- Finding the right balance of trust and accountability…they can overcome fate by making different choices and efforts.
- You must own the problem to own the solution – avoiding handouts and dependency.
- What’s in it for you? (or what do they think your quid pro quo is?)
- Understanding worldview – honour/shame, power/fear or guilt/innocence.
- Freewill and determinism – self-help vs karma
Chapter 10 in this book – free download https://thealliancecanada.ca/resources/on-mission/